In this era of information explosion, every debate by U.S. presidential candidates attracts global attention like a Hollywood blockbuster.
In the recent debate, Trump once again became the focal point of public opinion with his unique style.
Mainstream media widely praised his performance, claiming he almost "won" by an overwhelming margin.
However, Trump's rhetoric, especially his comments on domestic and foreign enemies, added some tension to the debate, which is worth our careful consideration.
In the debate, Trump proposed a thought-provoking idea: "The U.S. doesn't need to be enemies with China, Russia, or North Korea. With a rational president, these countries can reconcile."
This rhetoric challenges the current diplomatic strategy and sparks imaginations about new possibilities in international relations.
Trump's comments imply that the cold point of international relations stems not from external factors but from domestic governance issues.
Trump made a shocking statement during the debate: "The biggest threat to the U.S. is domestic."
He not only criticized the Biden administration but also deeply touched on the political dilemmas within the U.S.
He pointed out that Biden's problem is "extreme incompetence," not his age. Trump's direct criticism reflects a profound reflection on domestic institutional failures and decision-making paralysis.
Despite the controversy, these remarks force society to confront internal obstacles and re-examine how to unite and solve differences for the national future.
Trump also discussed U.S.-China relations, blaming Biden for the deterioration of bilateral relations during his tenure, particularly mentioning the awkward Alaska talks and Pelosi's visit to Taiwan, which he believed exacerbated tensions between the two countries.
Regarding U.S.-Russia relations, Trump attributed the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict to Biden, arguing that the U.S.'s tough stance heightened the confrontation.
He mentioned the Russia-North Korea mutual defense treaty and North Korea's missile tests, implying that U.S. foreign policy has not brought global security.
Looking back at Trump's foreign policy, despite its controversy, there were highlights, such as his direct dialogues with Putin and historic meetings with North Korean leaders, showcasing his unique approach to international relations.
Trump did not hide his dissatisfaction with Biden's foreign policy, even hinting that if he could return to the White House, he would take tougher measures against China, such as imposing tariffs to revive the U.S.'s negotiating position.
Although Trump's statements always provoke various interpretations and concerns, to improve relations with countries around the world, especially with China, the U.S. needs more than just verbal toughness or easing but practical actions.
Whether on the international political stage or in daily life, actions speak louder than words.
Trump's candidness offers us a new perspective on observing U.S. foreign policy.
But beyond reflection, we should ask: How can we promote genuine cooperation and peace in a complex and changing international environment?
As one of the world's major powers, every move the U.S. makes affects the world's nerves.
So, dear readers, what do you think? It's time to put down your phones, look up at the world, and think about what each of us can do for peace.
After all, world peace is everyone's responsibility. Feel free to leave your thoughts in the comments section and let's contribute our thinking power to the future of this planet together.
In reviewing Trump's foreign policy, his unique stance on NATO and European affairs cannot be ignored.
He frequently questioned NATO members' defense spending, demanding allies bear more costs.
This stance sparked widespread controversy but also prompted some countries to increase their military budgets and strengthen their investment in NATO.
Additionally, Trump's "America First" policy reshaped U.S. trade strategy, engaging in fierce trade negotiations and tariff disputes with multiple countries, profoundly impacting the global economic landscape.
Trump's interactions with various international leaders during his tenure also drew attention.
Besides his meetings with Putin and Kim Jong-un, his relationships with other national leaders, such as Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau, German Chancellor Merkel, and British Prime Minister Johnson, were equally complex and volatile.
These interactions reflected the pragmatism and controversy coexisting in the Trump administration's handling of ally relationships.
Trump's criticism of domestic issues in the debate also reflected his focus on the intertwined relationship between domestic governance and foreign affairs.
He believed that domestic governance issues directly affect the handling of international relations.
For instance, U.S. economic policies, social conflicts, and political divisions all, to some extent, weaken its leadership in international affairs.
Therefore, solving domestic issues is key to enhancing the U.S.'s international influence.
Trump's rhetoric and policies often sparked heated discussions among media and the public.
Supporters believe he dared to speak frankly, challenged traditions, and brought new ways of thinking and policy directions.
Opponents think his words and actions are too radical, easily causing unnecessary international tensions and domestic social divisions.
These different voices reflect the diversity and divisions of American society in the Trump era.
Whether Trump will become president again in the future or not, his political legacy has deeply influenced U.S. foreign policy and political landscape.
His governance philosophy, policy measures, and interactions with international leaders will be crucial legacies for subsequent leaders to address and handle.
Finding a balance between inheritance and adjustment will be a major challenge for future U.S. foreign policy.
In this rapidly changing information era, every country and every leader faces complex choices.
Trump's rhetoric and policies, whether right or wrong, respond to these complexities.
As citizens of a global major power, we each have the responsibility to understand, participate, and drive our country and the world towards a more peaceful and prosperous direction.
In this era of globalization, everyone's fate is closely linked to international relations.
Let's think together about how to promote global peace and cooperation through practical actions.
I hope everyone can gain insights from Trump's debate, stay informed about international dynamics, participate in public discussions, and collectively contribute to planning our future.
Comments