Nigeria, the major country in sub-Saharan Africa, has achieved some milestones on its path to independence since shedding British colonial rule.
As the most populous country in Africa, Nigeria boasts rich natural resources and a solid economic foundation, originally positioning it to play a more significant role on the continent.
However, a series of historical decisions have caused Nigeria to miss the opportunity to become the undisputed leader of West Africa.
In the early days of independence, Nigeria faced an unpredictable African landscape.
After several West African countries freed themselves from French colonial rule, Nigeria had the chance to exert its influence and lead the region toward greater autonomy and prosperity.
However, the Nigerian government chose to maintain close cooperation with France, even helping France maintain its influence in the region.
This choice led neighboring countries striving for independence to lose trust in Nigeria.
In recent years, as France's global influence has waned, its influence in West Africa has also diminished. This presented Nigeria with a prime opportunity to demonstrate its regional leadership.
Unfortunately, the Nigerian government failed to seize this opportunity, continuing to side with France and opposing those countries experiencing anti-French coups.
This choice not only failed to enhance Nigeria's status but also damaged its prestige among West African countries seeking independence, turning it into an obstacle rather than a bridge for regional cooperation.
These historical choices and missed opportunities reveal that, despite Nigeria's resources and potential to become a leading African nation, it has lacked ambition and decisiveness at critical moments.
In this context, Nigeria has not only limited its own development but also failed to provide the leadership and guidance that West Africa and the entire sub-Saharan Africa region needed.
Geopolitical Landscape of Sub-Saharan Africa
Nigeria's political landscape and geopolitical relations form the core of its foreign strategy.
After independence, although Nigeria gained autonomy from Britain, it did not completely shake off the influence of Western powers, especially through its close cooperation with France.
During the Cold War, Africa became a battleground for influence between Western countries and the Soviet Union, with Nigeria as a focal point.
France placed particular importance on Nigeria, seeing it as a foothold to maintain its influence in Africa.
Through economic aid, military cooperation, and cultural exchanges, France gradually deepened its relationship with Nigeria.
Nigeria's significant position in sub-Saharan Africa, with its large market and resource-rich land, made it a priority for economic cooperation with neighboring and European countries.
However, Nigeria's foreign strategy exhibited a conservative tendency, preferring stable relations with traditional powers rather than actively seeking regional leadership.
Over the decades following independence, Nigeria made some economic progress but showed excessive caution in its foreign policy toward neighboring countries and former colonial rulers.
Wave of Coups in West Africa
As France's influence globally and in Africa gradually declined, West Africa experienced a wave of coups, primarily aimed at shaking off French economic and political control.
Military coups in countries like Niger, Burkina Faso, and Mali marked these nations' efforts to gain greater political autonomy.
This period was an excellent opportunity for Nigeria to demonstrate its regional leadership.
However, in the face of these coups and the neighbors' desire for independence, Nigeria chose to support France's continued influence in these countries, even participating in pressuring them. This decision significantly diverged from domestic and international expectations of Nigeria.
This choice by the Nigerian government not only damaged its image among neighboring countries but also weakened its leadership position on the African continent.
While Nigeria's close cooperation with France might have brought short-term political and economic benefits, it ultimately sacrificed the country's geopolitical interests and regional influence.
This foreign policy choice reflects the Nigerian government's shortsightedness and conservatism in handling international relations.
Missing the Opportunity to Lead West Africa
Nigeria's decisions during the wave of West African coups highlight the limitations of its foreign strategy.
Had the Nigerian government chosen to support its neighbors' quests for independence rather than maintaining old ties with France, its regional and even continental status could have seen a significant transformation.
Supporting these countries could have established a Nigeria-led West African alliance, enhancing political and economic cooperation among member states, collectively resisting foreign interference, and achieving regional autonomy and independence.
However, the Nigerian government's choice led to estranged, even hostile, relationships with these countries, directly weakening Nigeria's influence in West Africa.
This shortsighted foreign policy not only affected Nigeria's international image but also risked its marginalization in global political and economic spheres.
This strategic failure reflects Nigeria's internal political and economic issues.
The Path Forward
After a series of diplomatic challenges and missed opportunities for regional leadership, Nigeria and its sub-Saharan African neighbors stand at a new historical crossroads.
To occupy a more active and leading role in regional and global politics, Nigeria must reconsider and revise its foreign policy.
Firstly, Nigeria needs to shift its strategy from supporting external powers to supporting its neighbors' autonomy and independence.
This can repair relationships with neighboring countries and strengthen regional unity and cooperation to collectively face external pressures.
Nigeria should leverage its economic and political influence to promote regional integration and economic cooperation, rather than following external powers.
Additionally, sub-Saharan African countries need to strengthen internal structural building, improve governance, promote economic development, and ensure social stability.
Through these efforts, these countries can elevate their international status and become independent actors on the global stage.
In conclusion, the future of Nigeria and sub-Saharan Africa should be based on enhancing internal strength and genuine regional cooperation.
Only when these countries achieve self-governance and demonstrate greater independence and initiative in international affairs can they ensure their prosperity and security and play a more significant role in global politics.
Nigeria's actions will be key to observing whether this transformation can occur.
Comments